Thursday, January 29, 2015

Collaboration

*Bumper sticker that says, "Hang up and Drive."
*Mike Rowe- arguing on the head of a pin FACEBOOK
*News websites
*Macklemore song, Same Love
*Seahawks' Lynch Angered Press Won't Respect Privacy

Collaborative Exercise: With Matthew Wiest & Margaret MacKay & Lizzie DeRushaWe've chosen the bumper sticker!We like the 90's cell phone. It is an issue that we can all relate to.Failure: bumper stickers are not memorable. If we were to change the medium, we would post on Facebook with more information vs the one liner. We could also post on YouTube vivid details and graphic images of certain death caused by texting and driving.



Taking a stance


The most common situations I run into that require taking a positions is usually things like whether I thought a movie was good or bad, or if a singer was good or bad, maybe they have potential. Sometimes I'll be talking with friends and issues like religious beliefs, gay rights, or respect for other people will arise. In those situations, depending on who I am talking with, I try to keep my mouth shut because I know I don't agree with the other person and neither one of us is willing to give ground. There are instances, of course, where I do speak up, like most recently when a good friend of mine injured herself and I had to convince her that after eight weeks of pain, it was worth missing one class in order to go get a referral for physical therapy from her doctor.

How often people take a position on something really depends on the kind of day they're having. If they're anything like me, there will be many days when interactions with other people are scarce or don't consist of conversations in which I am a part. Most of my stance-taking recently comes from being in classes where the students have to exchange ideas on a subject. A few months ago, I would have had to take positions more frequently when trying to explain, describe, or deny things about living in the United States to my friends in France. There will always be minor choices in day to day life that will result in hardly earth shattering decisions. But being involved in situations that allow you to put in your two cents worth requires more interaction.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Narrative final, or at leat revised, draft


Listening Literacy

Most high school students complain about their home work load, and I was no exception. My friends would often respond to my lack of enthusiasm with an “I understand how you feel,” and all I could think was, “no, you really don’t.” Now, I was under no illusions that I actually had more work than anyone else, but quantity was not the issue, it was time involved with each assignment. The thing is, I read slowly, like snail’s pace slow, and snails can’t read. Comprehension was never a problem, it was just that my eyes could not move across the page at the same rate as other peoples. As a kid words and letters were always getting mixed up in my brain, and they still do. Unofficially, I am dyslexic, meaning I’ve taken tests to identify dyslexia, but never actually been “diagnosed”. As you can imagine, this was very discouraging growing up, especially when you take in to account my role models. Most of my friends were grades ahead in reading, whereas I was always grades behind. And then there is my father. He is the fastest reader in existence, going through two or three books a day. It was hard not being able to keep up with anyone.
Despite everything, I had a strong love for story telling that could not be suppressed, so I became an avid listener. Every room in my life was filled with voices, like the gold tinged living room with one wall made entirely of sliding glass doors. In the evenings, long, heavy drapes would be pulled across to keep in the heat. In one corner, next to the piano, is my dad’s big, blue armchair. It is old and falling apart, and for half of my life it has sat empty while he was at sea, but when he was home, he would sit in that chair, feet up on the matching footstool, with the standing lamp lit behind him. A cup of tea would be on the side table to his left, next to which his glasses would sit, having been discarded for the time being. The room would smell like that peach tea, and sometimes of Christmas, and his voice would be rumbling along through a story, rising and falling with each character. A general rule for the holidays has always been that my father would read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings in the evenings. For the rest of the year there were other fantasies like David Eddings’ The Belgariad. As a child I would lie on the floor playing with stuffed animals or scribbling on bits of paper, but as I grew, I upgraded to an armchair which is perfectly positioned so that I can use the edge of my dad’s foot stool.
Whenever my father’s voice was not available, there were always audio books. In the bright red kitchen where pale cupboards that have taken on a pinkish hue from light reflecting off the walls, there is the audio system. In my adolescence, there sat a huge, old, black tape player and radio that would skip ahead if you walked too close, the vibrations from the floor rattling the sensitive system. Now there is a small CD player that tends to eat discs when we’re not looking. I would listen to everything from fantasy novels to The Story of the World for eighth grade history. And at night, one of the Harry Potter books would lull me to sleep. My tiny gray tape player would be buzzing quietly with narrator Jim Dale’s immensely versatile voice playing over the hum. Even today, I listen to audio books, they are an effective way to get through a book while washing dishes or driving in the car, and for me it’s faster than reading the book myself.
As well as listening, I often was exposed to visual representations of stories. My family has always been addicted to theater as well as literature. Most people find it hard to believe that I grew up watching Much Ado About Nothing and As You Like It along with the usual Disney movies kids watch, but that was my childhood. As a result I have always had a love, almost an obsession, with Shakespeare’s works. Strange, I know.
What do these things have to do with each other, or anything for that matter? This has all been a very roundabout way of saying that I didn’t read a lot as a child, and in school, I was never able keep some personal reading on the side as well as the books required by classes. It is safe to say that growing up, I was exposed to more books in audio form than I ever read myself. As a result of my snail’s pace, anything I read required a great deal of dedication, and time. Logically then, would it have made sense for me to read something I had already heard or read before? Not really. This isn’t an embarrassing or shameful part of my life, and with all my personal experience, I could go on and on, as I have, about the benefits and wonders of listening to stories. However, there is one drawback. Listening to a book means I was only exposed to the narrator’s perspective on how the character would sound or act. This was not a huge issue as ninety nine percent of the time, I would agree with the narrator, but it did mean I wouldn’t get to draw my own conclusions.
Not so long ago, at the end of my senior year of high school, that changed. As we had already taken the exams and finished the course curriculum, my AP English teacher required each of us to pick our own book to read before giving a presentation on it. My choice was Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice. I had seen this performed in Ashland many years before and I was in possession of the Al Pacino and Jeremy Iron’s film version. I had also heard it from various places and read most of Asimov's guide about it, but never had I read it for myself. It was a challenge I set for myself, and an enlightening one at that. I was suddenly able to see this story not only in the way others had perceived it, but also in my own way. Even though it was the same story, and I knew what was going to happen, it was like reading something entirely new because of the different format. The experience was entirely freeing and enlightening - to read about these characters but without being restricted by someone else’s interpretations of their words and emotions.
Sitting in my somewhat darkened English classroom, the windows covered by sheets of deep blue paper, I plunged into a world so familiar yet so foreign, all the while soft noises of the tea pot boiling, and snickering students lingered in the background. I could hear and see in my mind the colorful interpretations that I had known before, but also a new setting and new characters that I hadn’t really known. While sitting on the horribly uncomfortable chairs, I suddenly saw that Shylock became more retched, more pitiable, Bassanio less noble, Antonio more conniving, Portia more brilliant, and Jessica more lonely. 
I have no doubt that my previous interactions with the play were involved with how I portrayed the story in my mind’s eye, and in fact I think they were helpful. I felt less of the pressure of a normal reading assignment, so the experience of reading this play was like a gift, not work. Because it was the first time I had attempted to break out of the confines of others’ views, completing the play was like crossing some invisible finish line, one that all my reading experiences throughout my life had been leading up to.
Though I am sure I am not alone in the world of audio book listeners, I have never met anyone who has had the same dependence on them that I do. And up until this point, I have never really reflected back on this aspect of my life. Thinking back, I realize that I had never given much credit to it before. I have been on a path of self-discovery, and one, I imagine, that will continue well beyond my high school assignment.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Narrative rough draft


Please keep in mind that this is a very rough draft, not all of my transitions make sense, and that while I was writing this, it grew from my original prompt into something more.
Most high school students complain about their home work load, and I was no exception. Many times, I was less than enthusiastic about my work load. Often my friends would respond with an “I understand how you feel,” and all I could think was, no you really don’t. Now, I was under no illusions that I actually had more work than anyone else, but quantity was not the issue, it was time involved with each assignment. The thing is, I read slowly, like snail’s pace slow, and snails can’t read. Comprehension was never a problem, it was just that my eyes could not move across the page at the same rate as other peoples. As a kid words and letters were always getting mixed up in my brain, and they still do. Unofficially, I am dyslexic, meaning I’ve taken tests to identify dyslexia, but never actually been “diagnosed”. As you can imagine, this was very discouraging growing up, especially when you take in to account my role models. Most of my friends were grades ahead in reading, where as I was always grades behind. And then there is my father. He is the fastest reader in existence, going through two or three books a day. It was hard not being able to keep up with anyone.

Despite everything, I had a strong love for story telling that could not be suppressed, so I became an avid listener. Every room in my life was filled with voices, like the gold tinged living room with one wall made entirely of sliding glass doors. In the evenings, long, heavy drapes would be pulled across to keep in the heat. In one corner, next to the piano, is my dad’s big, blue armchair. It is old and falling apart, and for half of my life it has sat empty while he was at sea, but when he was home, he would sit in that chair, feet up on the matching footstool, with the standing lamp lit behind him. He would have a cup of tea on the side table to his left, next to which his glasses would sit, having been discarded for the time being. The room would smell like his peach tea, and sometimes of Christmas, and his voice would be plodding along through the story, rising and falling with each character. A general rule for the holidays has always been that my father would read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings in the evenings. For the rest of the year there were other fantasies like David Eddings’ The Belgariad. As a child I would lie on the floor playing with stuffed animals or scribbling on bits of paper, but as I grew, I upgraded to an armchair which is perfectly positioned so that I can use the edge of my dad’s foot stool.

When ever my father’s voice was not available, there was always audio books. In the bright red kitchen with pale cupboards that have taken on a pinkish hue from light reflecting off the walls, there is the audio system. In my adolescence, there sat a huge, old, black tape player and radio that would skip ahead if you walked too close, the vibrations from the floor rattling the sensitive system. Now there is a small CD player that tends to eat discs when we’re not looking. I would listen to everything from fantasy novels to The Story of the Word for eighth grade history. And at night, one of the Harry Potter books would lull me to sleep. My tiny gray tape player would be buzzing quietly with narrator Jim Dale’s greatly versatile voice playing over the hum. Even today, I listen to audio books, they are an effective way to get through a book while do dishes or driving in the car, and for me it’s faster than reading the book myself.

As well as listening, I would often be exposed to visual representations of stories. My family has always been addicted to theater as well as literature, most people find it hard to believe that I grew up watching Much Ado About Nothing and As You Like It along with the usual Disney movies kids watch, but that was my childhood. As a result I have always had a love, almost an obsession, with Shakespeare’s works. Strange, I know.

 What do these things have to do with each other, or anything for that matter? This has all been a very roundabout way of saying that I didn't read a lot as a child, and in school, I was never able keep some personal reading on the side as well as books required by classes. It is safe to say that growing up, I was exposed to more books in audio form than I ever read myself. As a result of my snail’s pace, anything I read required a great deal of dedication, time, and patients. Logically then, would it have made sense for me to read something I had already heard or read before? Not really. This isn't an embarrassing or shameful part of my life, and with all my personal experience, I could go on and on, as I have, about the benefits and wonders of listening to stories. However, there is one drawback. Listening to a book means I was only exposed to the narrator’s perspective on how the character would sound or act. This was not a huge issue as ninety nine percent of the time, I would agree with the narrator, but it did mean I wouldn't get to draw my own conclusions.

Not so long ago, that changed. At the end of my senior year of high school. As we had already taken the exams, and finished the course curriculum, my AP English teacher had everyone pick their own book to read and give a presentation on it. My choice was Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice. I had seen this performed in Ashland many years before and I was also in possession of Al Pacino and Jeremy Iron’s film version, I had also heard it from various places and read most of Asimov's guide about it, but I had never read it myself. It was a challenge I set for myself, and an enlightening one at that. I was suddenly able to see this story not only in the way others had perceived it, but also in my own way. Even though it was the same story, and I knew what was going to happen, it was like reading something entirely new because of the different format. The experience was entirely freeing and enlightening, to read about these characters but without being restricted by someone else’s interpretations of their words and emotions.

Sitting in my English classroom, that was usually somewhat dark with the windows covered, with the soft noises of people snickering, and the water pot for tea boiling in the background, I plunged into a world so familiar yet so foreign. I could hear and see in my mind the colorful interpretations that I had known before, but also a new setting and new characters that I hadn’t really known. While sitting on the horrible uncomfortable chairs, I suddenly saw that Shylock became more retched, more pitiable, Bassanio less noble, Antonio more conniving, Portia more brilliant, and Jessica more lonely.  

I have no doubt that my previous interactions with the play were involved with how I portrayed the story in my mind’s eye, in fact I think it was helpful. There was less of the pressures of a normal reading assignment, so the experience of reading this play was like a gift, not work. Also because it was the first time I had attempted to break out confines of other’s views, finishing the play was like crossing some invisible finishing line, one that all my reading experiences throughout my life had been leading up to.

This has been a trial that I doubt most people have been through. Though I am sure I am not alone in the world of audio book listeners, I have never met anyone who has had the same dependence on them. And up until this point, I have never really reflected back on this part of my life. Perhaps, one day, I will write a narrative about writing this narrative, as it has made me think about events that I had never given much credence to before. I have been on a path of self-discovery, and one, I imagine, that will continue well beyond my high school assignment.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Possible narrative topics


Reading story that I had only ever heard before or seen before /reading my favorite Shakespeare for the first time
  • What happened and who was involved? – I have a few options for this the first would be to write about Jane Austin’s Pride and Prejudice, which happens to be one of my favorite books, or when I read Merchant of Venice for the first time. Everyone in the class read Pride and Prejudice, but I was the only one to read Merchant of Venice.
  • When and where did it happen? - Both occurred in my AP English class senior year of high school.
  • What makes the story comes alive? – It was a big deal for me to see these stories that I love so much in a different format. It was very freeing to read about these characters but without being restricted by someone else’s interpretations of their words and emotions.
  • Who’s telling the story? - As it shall be a narrative about me, I shall write it in first person.
  • Why does the story matter? – It shows the dedication involved for reading something I was already familiar with, something I never do because reading can be difficult.

Preparing for my AP English exams.
  • What happened and who was involved? -  My English teacher would have our class read and grade essays from years past, then use those examples to practice our own timed essays.
  • When and where did it happen? - My AP English class senior year of high school.
  • What makes the story comes alive? – It was a very difficult tasks for me to write convincing essays in such a different format with a time limit. I had a very hard time trying to shift my style of writing to fit what I was asked to do.
  • Who’s telling the story? - ME!
  • Why does the story matter? – It was a big challenge to try and switch formats and expand writing comfort zone.

Receiving post cards from my dad while he was at sea.
  • What happened and who was involved? – My father would send me postcards when he would be in port.
  • When and where did it happen? – Every time he went to sea while I was growing up, up until I was maybe 12
  • What makes the story comes alive? – My dad has been away for half of my life, and when his ship was not in port, there would be no way to contact him. As a kid I didn’t have an email, so his postcards were the only way I had to hear from him.
  • Who’s telling the story? – Margaret MacKay
  • Why does the story matter? - They may not have been particularly detailed or lengthy, but for a child those postcards were extremely important pieces of literature to grow off of.

Collaborations

We haven’t done very much extensive discussions yet to go off of, and so far the discussions have been mostly one on one. Not so great for collaborative discussions. Mostly I have tried to engage who ever I’m talking with and to add other contradicting views, but so far, everything we have been discussing generally tends to be topics that we all agree on. Based on what we’ve done, it would be very easy to improve collaborative discussions. To have a real collaboration, which I’m sure we will at some point, it would really be best to involve the entire class. The more people there are, the more chance there will be to have a greater variety of views and opinions. It would also mean having more people to use as sounding boards to bounce ideas off of and to get different definitions of things someone might not understand. I think collaboration is one of those things that can be very easy to do, but also very easy not to do. The book described setting meeting times, providing food, setting tasks or goals, but I don’t think it needs to be so in-depth. All you really need is a topic for discussion is a topic and a few people willing to engage.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Narratives


I’m sure I hear a lot of narrative in a day, but the moment I have to recall them I can’t remember what they were, so…
These aren’t from one day but they are the first things that came to mind.
  • Personal narrative - Woman describing her son’s hip replacement as the basis for taking a human biology class.
  • Fable - Children’s picture books, they always seem to have a good moral.
  • Informational - Newspaper story about a baby Orca in Puget Sound.
  • Fable - Church sermon on man walking to D.C. who stops to help a woman with a broken car.
  • Fable - “Step Away” song by me and my cousin.
Honestly I am having difficulty with the concept of “narrative”. The definition seems straight forward enough, but when applying it to things, I get confused. So I made so sub-categories to help myself. Narratives, to me, can be personal, a fable, or informational.
 
Personal would be a first person account of an event from your life that explains a change or decision process. It allows for others to make personal connections by comparing their own narratives that may be similar.
 
Fable is a story, which is not necessarily real, told to deliver a moral or point through examples or general concepts.
 
Informational is when real world events are described alongside educational points. The main story if the event, but it is also being used as a vehicle to carry interesting or necessary information to the public. This could be a fun article in the paper about the new orca pup or a broadcaster over the radio talking about real people just as an interesting side note.
 
 
For me, watching the videos was more powerful than just reading personal narratives. The speakers had rhythms and cadences to their voices, and their faces expressed more emotions than can be describe in text. In the translation from speech to writing, you lose those fundamental human connections that don’t transition into language. The story being told has a rawer feel when it comes in video form, it seems like there is less revisions and editing (though I’m sure there are some) and things don’t get left out. The viewer has the opportunity to see, not just imagine, the emotional content of the speaker. It also makes the event feel more real. With videos, you have the ability to say, “This is real, that person is an average Joe, just like me.” With writing, there is less personal connection, you have to do more work synthesizing the context, who is this person, what are they like, how do I imagine them looking, instead of just taking in the point of the narrative.
 
 
Personal narratives are so much more affective to me on video or face to face because much of the time they are about comparing stories with others to find common ground, it can be difficult to make such a human connection with writing. Writing is certainly capable of stirring sympathetic emotions, but not as much of a connection.
 
Information is really best in text or audio form. Whereas reading an article about the whales in the Puget Sound was interesting and uplifting, if I had been listening to some instructor about it, my mind would have wondered. Reading a story like that or hearing it on the radio is an engaging way of passing along the narrative while leaving the hands and/or eyes free to do other things. It may be an interesting topic to some people, but I would bet that if most had to engage in watching and hearing the information from a speaker, they would become disinterested and lose focus. If that were to happen, the event and information would become less memorable.

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Response to What is rhetoric?

I appreciate the way you put everything into a larger context and used real-world examples in your explanation. They are very helpful for trying to think about rhetoric as not just a writing term, but as a way of thinking and acting in many situations.
                                           -Comment on Taylor Wade's "What does rhetoric mean to me?" 

I liked the way you contrasted one example by looking at it from different angles. I agree with your analysis, but based on your definition, could it be said that only writing designed to focus on a specific group can be rhetorical?
                                                    -Comment on Nick Mooth's "The definition of Rhetoric"
                                                                                                   http://nnanbt.blogspot.com/


It is interesting that you mentioned that it is unlikely the writer will understand every point of view. I feel like that is a very important concept that is easily forgotten. Your explanation was also good at pointing out that it is alright to add personal feelings to your writing as long as you keep and open mind and don't ignore other angles.
                                                                   -Comment on RAGainer's "what is rhetoric?"
                                                                                          http://eng101rag.blogspot.com/
 
  
Reading other people's blogs was really helpful to me. When I'm writing, I tend to get really caught up in trying to explain myself and my writing becomes more complicated and harder to follow. This was a nice reminder that I need to try and simplify things when I'm writing in such a casual setting.

I also found that, even though my definition was pretty close to other peoples, having it explained 
differently really made me wonder if I agree with my own explanation. I noticed that I focused a lot on writing for an audience, but after reading other blogs, I realized that I didn't mention whether or not writing can be rhetorical if it isn't targeting a specific group of people. So just to throw it out there, I do think writing can be rhetorical, even if there isn't a set audience in mind. 


Discussion on commenting:
I don’t really think that my comments differed vary much from what I would say to a person face to face. I really don’t like the lack of accountability that is involved in online, anonymous posts, so I try never to write something that I would not be willing to say in person. To a certain extent, I suppose I do try to word things a little differently or leave out some things because I know that what some one reads could be preserved differently than what they hear, and since I am not in the room with them to explain or defend my comment, I attempt not to say anything that could cause someone to become offended or defensive.

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

What is rhetoric?


To think or act rhetorically:
  • To articulate in an effective and persuasive manner by providing a well informed position or argument while still being open to the ideas of others.
 
Most definitions I have found on the term "rhetoric" explain it as the art of persuasion, but what I have gleaned from the rest of those definitions is that it isn't as much about persuading anyone as it is about applying the most effective formatting to your writing.
 
The first step for the author, or speaker, is to know what it is they are talking about. They must understand their argument or idea is so that they can form an opinion, research and provide the applicable information. While researching, it is best to look into and comprehend what opposing views might be so as to provide rebuttals to those arguments.
 
The author must also understand for who they are presenting their information. Knowing whose ears their work while reach provides the author with basic do's and don't in regards to language and formality. Also, different audiences provide opportunities for different types of presentations, meaning the author can apply other mediums to their presentation besides text.
 
In addition to providing formatting information, understanding the audience can provide the author with insight on how best to persuade the viewers. Having some idea where the reader or spectator is coming from allows the author to compose the information in a way that may be more accessible.

List of my writing

My writing from the week thus far:
  • English Introduction
  • Blog post on Intro
  • Blog post on formal vs. casual
  • Biology notes
  • Personal fiction
  • Email to my boss
  • Chats with friends
I think the most different of the three would be my first blog entry, chats with my best friend, and the fantasy I am writing. None of these followed a particularly formal rhetoric as it wasn't necessary.

For my blog post on the introduction, much like the emails I send to my boss, I attempted to be informative and brief. It was not my intent to boggle any one's mind with bizarre or complicated language, to bore them with excessive information, nor to persuade anyone that my idea was the best, it was all just a statement of opinion. The language I used was not strictly speaking "formal", but it was not as casual as the language I use with my close friends.

When chatting with my friends, there is very little structure called for. Grammar and spelling aren't considered, and are usually ignored for entertainment. Pictures, videos and music are frequent additions to are attempts at communication, and very rarely do we say anything of real consequence.

In my personal writings, the language and tones I use tend to vary from my own as I am writing from the perspectives of the fictional characters that I am trying to bring to life. In that way, there is a lot of persuasion involved since I am trying to convince the reader that it is not my voice, but the voices of many characters, and that all the added details are describing tangible places and events.


Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Formal vs. Casual

Professional Authors                                                Everyday Author
Published under a label
Self-published
Generally specialized in a specific area
Casual format to writing
Some form of formal training in their area
May not be as dependable as far as research
Works through levels of organization
Available to write about anything.
Uses outside resources and editors
Writing can be more for personal gratification
May be assigned/ asked to pursue a subject





Formal Writing                                                         Casual Writing
More lack of emotion or bias (hopefully)
My be heavier on emotion or opinion
No personal attachment/written in 3rd person
More conversational/simpler terms are used  
No contractions of words
Can use 1st, 2nd, or 3rd person perspective
More research involved
More flexible to weight arguments or ideas
May be more academic




  1. Most of the differences came to mind after having read the introduction to Everyone’s an Author and from descriptions I have run across through prior exposure to the media.
  2. I came across additional differences by looking up each term, so that I could see other definitions and not just my own.
  3. I don’t think there is strictly just a “one or the other”, everything falls within degrees of something else. One writing may be closer to formal or informal than another writing, but that doesn’t make it part of just one category. I think the differences are important because they are used to determine where on the spectrum one article may fall.
  4. It is useful to know who I am writing for so that I can apply the proper format to my writing. In my own writing, I tend to look for writings by professional authors when it comes to research, and I find it helpful to read other informal chronicles for inspiration in my personal writings or fictions.